Ls Magazine Photo -rapidshare Is Digital "dumbing Down" Photography?

Is digital "dumbing down" photography? - ls magazine photo -rapidshare

In any case, to provoke the intention of further discussion or digital film.

But.

I agree with half a dozen magazines Photo (on paper) are both digital and film images.

At the moment I'm looking at a photo-essay is a 1Ds Mk2, Canon L-lenses and (perhaps $) 15,000 on the value of art.

A few pages later there is another test with an F100, 24-85 and 100 ISO film transparent. A kit for $ 1,000, maybe more, if the photographer shot many films.

The images of the film to digital success in the bush, in terms of detail, color, dynamic range burning (without light) and the parameter most difficult of all - the realism.

(It is not art - both tests are drawn very well.)

As I leafed through the pages of magazines that I see over and over again.

So here is my question. Digital has down the technical rules of photography dumbed away -?